"Professor A.T. Robertson and A.B. Bruce agree that 'kolasis aionion' of the
KJV has a literal meaning of 'age-lasting correction.'"
"Let me say to Bible students that we must be very careful how we use the word
'eternity.' We have fallen into great error in our constant usage of that word. There is
no word in the whole Book of God corresponding with our eternal..."
-G.
Campbell Morgan
Matthew 25:31-46 concerns the judgment of
NATIONS, not individuals. It is to be distinguished from other judgments mentioned in
Scripture, such as the judgment of the saints (2 Cor. 5:10-11); the second resurrection,
and the great white throne judgment (Rev. 20:11-15). The judgment of the nations is based
upon their treatment of the Lord's brethren (verse 40). No resurrection of the dead is
here, just nations living at the time. To apply verses 41 and 46 to mankind as a whole is
an error. Perhaps it should be pointed out at this time that the Fundamentalist
Evangelical community at large has made the error of gathering many Scriptures which speak
of various judgments which will occur in different ages and assigning them all to
"Great White Throne" judgment. This is a serious mistake. Matthew 25:46 speaks
nothing of "grace through faith." We will leave it up to the reader to decide
who the "Lord's brethren" are, but final judgment based upon the receiving of
the Life of Christ is not the subject matter of Matthew 25:46 and should not be
interjected here. Even if it were, the penalty is "age-during correction" and
not "everlasting punishment."
Dr. J.D. Dummelow, in his commentary on Matt.
25:31-46, says, "Christ here speaks of the judgment of Christians alone, because that
was the question which most concerned the apostles and their future converts... A common
interpretation, however, is that the judgment of all mankind is meant."
Professor A.T. Robertson, in his Word
Pictures in the N.T., and Prof. A.B. Bruce, in The Expositor's Greek Testament,
agree that the kolasis aionion, the "everlasting punishment" of the
KJV, has a literal meaning of "age-lasting correction."
Dr. F.W. Farrar says: "It may be
worthwhile, however, to point out once more to less educated readers that aion, aionios,
and their Hebrew equivalents in all combinations are repeatedly used of things which have
come to an end. Even Augustine admits (what, indeed, no one can deny), that in Scripture aion
and aionios must in many instances mean 'having an end,' and St. Gregory of
Nyssa, who at least knew Greek, uses aionios as the epithet for 'an
interval.'" Dean Farrar also states: "The pages of theologians in all ages show
a startling prevalence of such terms as 'everlasting death, everlasting damnation,
everlasting torments, everlasting vengeance, everlasting fire'-not one of which has
Scriptural authority." Dr. Farrar was well versed in the Biblical languages, author
of books on the life of Jesus, the life of Paul, and Greek grammar, as well as others.
Dr. Edwin Abbott, headmaster of the City of
London School, wrote in his Cambridge Sermons (p. 25), "And as for ourselves,
though occasionally mentioning in language general and metaphorical, states of eonian life
and eonian chastisment awaiting us after death, the Holy Scriptures give no detailed
information as to either condition." Dr. Abbott's conviction, as expressed, showed he
thought the received dogma was untenable.
An argument was introduced by Augustine, and
since his day incessantly repeated, that if aionios kolasis does not mean
"endless punishment," then there is no security for the believer that aionios
zoe means "endless life," and that he will enjoy the promise of endless
happiness. But Matt. 25:46 shows the "eonian chastisement" and "eonian
life" are of the same duration-lasting during the eons, and when the eons end, as
Scripture states they will (1 Cor. 10:11; Heb. 9:26), the time called "eonian"
is past and the life called "eonian" is finished, but life continues beyond the
eons, as Paul teaches at 1 Cor. 15:26: "The last enemy that shall be destroyed is
death." That is, the last, the final one in order. How will it be destroyed? First
Corinthians 15:22 gives the answer: "For as IN ADAM ALL are dying, even so IN CHRIST
ALL shall be made alive." Death is destroyed when ALL have been vivified, or made
alive, IN CHRIST. There will then be no more death. Just as life is destroyed by death, so
death is destroyed by life. Our present bodies are mortal and corruptible (1 Cor.
15:44-55), but when mankind is made alive IN CHRIST they will be raised immortal and
incorruptible.
Those who believe in a universal salvation as
is spoken of at Col. 1:15-20, and see the purpose of God's love and His plan for the eons,
are secure in their belief that the same number of those who are now dying as a result of
Adam's disobedience will be made alive in Christ. The ALL of these verses represent
exactly the same number of mankind. Romans 5:18-19 says, "by the offense of one,
judgment came upon all men-by the righteousness of One the free gift came upon all men-by
one man's disobedience the many were made sinners, so by the obedience of One shall the
many be made righteous." The "all men" and the "many" in these
verses include the same number of humans in both cases.
Theall"in 1 Cor. 15:22; Col. 1:15-22; and
Rom. 5:18-19 mean the same in every case. God's eonian purpose is to head up ALL in the
Christ, as is stated in Eph. 1:9-10 and 3:11.
Dr. Alford Plumer's An Exegetical Commentary
on the Gospel of Matthew (pp. 351-352): "It is often pointed out that 'eternal' (aionios)
in 'eternal punishment' must have the same meaning as in 'eternal life.' No doubt, but
that does not give us the right to say that 'eternal' in both cases means 'endless.'"
Dr. G. Campbell Morgan, preacher, teacher,
evangelist, and author; sometimes called the "prince of expositors," wrote in
his Studies of the Four Gospels concerning Matt. 25:31-46, "Then, moreover, we
must be careful not to read into this section of prophecy things which it does not
contain; for while it has been interpreted as though it were a description of the final
judgment, the Great White Throne-These shall go away into age-abiding punishment; but the
righteous into age-abiding life-the terms are co-equal in value, and whatever one means
the other means. Only remember that here Christ is not dealing with the subject of the
soul's destiny either in heaven or hell. They are terms that have to do wholly with the
setting up of the kingdom here in this world..." In Dr. Morgan's, God's Methods
with Men, he says (pp. 185-186), "Let me say to Bible students that we must be
very careful how we use the word 'eternity.' We have fallen into great error in our
constant usage of that word. There is no word in the whole Book of God corresponding with
our 'eternal,' which as commonly used among us, means absolutely without end." In his
book, The Corinthian Letters of Paul, the same author states concerning 1 Cor.
15:22 (p. 191): "The word Adam is used here in the sense of headship of a race, the
one from whom the race springs. But God's second Man was the last Adam. If we say second
Adam, we presuppose the possibility of a third Adam, another from whom a race shall
spring. There will be none such. It is 'first Adam' and 'last Adam.' What does
relationship with Him mean? In the program of God all are to be made alive in
Christ."
Sir Robert Anderson, a writer on eschatology,
says, "The N.T. unfolds an economy of times and seasons; many ages head up in the one
great age, within which the manifold purpose of God, in relation to earth, shall be
fulfilled. Here, these words eon, age are applicable, and are used."
Dr. Edward Plumptre, an eschatologist, wrote,
"I fail to find, as is used by the Greek Fathers, any instance in which the idea of
time duration is unlimited."
Dr. William White says, "That of the
widely different subjects to which aeonian is applied in the N.T., in 70 they are of a
limited and temporary nature."
Professor Knappe of Halle wrote, "The
Hebrew was destitute of any single word to express endless duration. The pure idea of
eternity is not found in any of the ancient languages."
Professor Hermann Oldhausen said, "The
Bible has no expression for endlessness. All the Biblical terms imply or denote long
periods." Dr. Oldhausen was a German Lutheran theologian.
Lexicographers note the fact that it was not
until the fifth century A.D. that theologians began to read the sense of endlessness into
Bible words. Dr. Lewis S. Chafer deplores the difficulty that the average reader of the
Bible will encounter in seeking to understand the real meaning of these passages, when he
notes how hopelessly the KJV has obscured the word aion. He said, "The word,
which in common usage has a limited meaning, is used by the translators as the one English
rendering for at least four widely differing ideas in the original. So that if the truth
contained in this important body of Scripture is to be understood, the student must not
only know the various meanings which are expressed by the one word, but also be able to
determine the correct use of it in the many passages in which it occurs. Therefore, the
KJV has placed the simple truth they contain beyond the average reader of the Bible. The
English word 'world,' as used in the New Testament, may mean a distinct period of time,
commonly known as an age (as its original is a few times translated), or it may refer to
the things created: the earth, its inhabitants, or their institution. The ages are often
referred to in Scripture, and the study of the exact conditions and purposes of each of
them are not fanciful; but it is rather the only adequate foundation for any true
knowledge of the Bible."
Dr. W.H. Griffith Thomas wrote in The
Christian, in a comment upon Heb. 11:3, "the word rendered 'worlds' is 'ages' and
refers not so much to the material creation as to the world regarded from the standpoint
of time... The last mentioned (age, aion) is the name used here, and it seems to
refer to what may be called time-worlds, the idea being that of various ages or
dispensations being planned by God with reference to a goal toward which all are
moving."
Dr. Thomas' notes on Rom. 5:18-19 were,
"As mankind's connection with Adam involved him in certain death, through sin, so his
relation to Christ insures to him life without fail. The double headship of mankind in
Adam and Christ show the significance of the work of redemption for the entire race."
Professor Max Muller says in reference to the
Latin word aeternum, "that it originally signified life or time, but has given rise
to a number of words expressing eternity-the very opposite of life and time." He says
the Latin aevum, that is, the Greek word "ainon, later aion,
became the name of time, age, and its derivative, aeviternus, or aeternus,
was made to express eternity."
Dr. Isaac Watts says, "There is not one
place in Scripture which occurs to me, where the word death necessarily signifies a
certain miserable immortality of the soul."
Professor Taylor Lewis states, "The
conception of absolute endlessness as etymological of olam or eon would
clearly have prevented plurals." He continues, "'ever' (German: ewig),
was originally a noun denoting age, just like the Greek, Latin and Hebrew words
corresponding to it." Dr. Lewis wrote an interesting article for Lange's
Commentary about the use of the words olam and aion as used at Ecc.
1:4.
Jeremy Taylor, a hell-fire advocate wavers, and
after his ebullient flashes of Systematic Hellology, is constrained to the
following modification in Jeremy Taylor's Works (vol. 3, p. 43), "Though the
fire is everlasting, not all that enters it is everlasting," then adds, "The
word everlasting signifies only to the end of its period." Would that other hell-fire
advocates were so honest.